Darlac Folding Pocket Saw - Review

Quixoticgeek

Section Hiker
I posted this review on BCUK today, but thought it may be of interest to some people here:


Following a recent thread on BCUK about small lightweight pocket saws, the Darlac DP818 folding pocket saw came out at the top of options to investigate. I bought myself one off of Ebay, but it's also available from the likes of Amazon. At a fraction over 8 quid including delivery, it seemed worth a punt to see if it's any good.

A few days after ordering, the saw arrived in the post. As it arrived, it's in a presentation retail package, the back of which has a small amount of info about the design of the teeth. Nothing fancy. The front of the package clearly declares that the saw is for upto 50mm wood.
packagefront01_sm.jpg


The back also gives details about the guarantee and how to maintain the saw.
packageback01_sm.jpg


My first reaction to taking the saw out the package is that it's light. 38.2g according to my scales. The second reaction is that it's a bit plasticy. Aside from blade I can't find any other metal components.
foldedsize01_sm.jpg


The saw locks in the unfolded position, but not in the folded position. Unfolded you get a handle of 5", total blade length of a fraction under 3¾", of which 88mm is toothed.

unfoldedlength01_sm.jpg

bladelength01_sm.jpg


The saw sits quite nicely in the hand, as well as in the pocket, the lack of weight is rather nice.
sawinhand01_sm.jpg


Of course this isn't a tool you buy just to keep in your pocket, it's an tool to use. So I took the saw out onto a local cycle path to tidy up some of the recent storm damage.

First up, a bit of dried wood that needed trimming back, it's about 2.5" across, so over the 50mm that the packaging suggests is max size for this saw. The saw went through it with relative ease, popping out a couple of times when I drew the saw back too far. It's a pull saw, so only cuts on the pull stroke, but it cut through the 2.5" within a couple of minutes without much effort. The handle is ok, not the best on the planet, but not the worst.
bigcut01_sm.jpg

bigcut02_sm.jpg


I didn't really buy the saw for cutting such large pieces, I got it mostly for cutting things in the region of a thumb or slightly bigger. On these sizes, the saw goes through with ease, I used it to tidy up a few broken branches along the cycle path. No problems.
mediumcut01_sm.jpg

thumbcut01_sm.jpg


But, the area this saw excels is green wood. On approximately thumb size green wood, this saw goes through with very little resistance, working very well.
greencut01_sm.jpg


In all the cuts, it left a nice clean face behind. Nothing jagged on the dead wood, and very little on the green wood.

The saw is no Laplander or Silky. But for 8 quid and 38g, as a saw you can leave in your handbag for occasional use, it's ideal, and certainly easier to use than the smaller saw on my leatherman. Time will tell how durable it turns out to be, but right now, I don't think I've wasted my money.

Julia
 

Mole

Thru Hiker
Good review Julia.

Like you say, better for greenwood. For the type of walker who likes to cut a stick (tarp poles)from the hedge/copse, it's the lightest option I ever found. A fraction of the weight of most other folders.

I bought one of these at a garden show some years ago. (a fiver back then). I keep it in my 'greenwood' tool box for spoon making workshops, but haven't done much of that sort of work for a couple of years now. It's OK, but yes, it didn't keep sharp and hard like a Silky (not impulse hardened), but it'll last if cared for. Mine is still 'OK'. (I think! - I should dig it out and see)
 

Quixoticgeek

Section Hiker
Aye, might be useful for people who burn biomass to save breaking everything over their knee. At 38g it seems silly not to include it in the bag.

J
 
Top